European Journal of Sustainable Development Research

Present and Future Sustainability Development of 3D Metal Printing
Austin Anderson 1, Selso Gallegos 1, Behnaz Rezaie 1 * , Fardad Azarmi 2
More Detail
1 University of Idaho, USA
2 North Dakota State University, USA
* Corresponding Author
Review Article

European Journal of Sustainable Development Research, 2021 - Volume 5 Issue 3, Article No: em0168

Published Online: 08 Aug 2021

Views: 227 | Downloads: 276

How to cite this article
APA 6th edition
In-text citation: (Anderson et al., 2021)
Reference: Anderson, A., Gallegos, S., Rezaie, B., & Azarmi, F. (2021). Present and Future Sustainability Development of 3D Metal Printing. European Journal of Sustainable Development Research, 5(3), em0168.
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Anderson A, Gallegos S, Rezaie B, Azarmi F. Present and Future Sustainability Development of 3D Metal Printing. EUR J SUSTAIN DEV RES. 2021;5(3):em0168.
AMA 10th edition
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Anderson A, Gallegos S, Rezaie B, Azarmi F. Present and Future Sustainability Development of 3D Metal Printing. EUR J SUSTAIN DEV RES. 2021;5(3), em0168.
In-text citation: (Anderson et al., 2021)
Reference: Anderson, Austin, Selso Gallegos, Behnaz Rezaie, and Fardad Azarmi. "Present and Future Sustainability Development of 3D Metal Printing". European Journal of Sustainable Development Research 2021 5 no. 3 (2021): em0168.
In-text citation: (Anderson et al., 2021)
Reference: Anderson, A., Gallegos, S., Rezaie, B., and Azarmi, F. (2021). Present and Future Sustainability Development of 3D Metal Printing. European Journal of Sustainable Development Research, 5(3), em0168.
In-text citation: (Anderson et al., 2021)
Reference: Anderson, Austin et al. "Present and Future Sustainability Development of 3D Metal Printing". European Journal of Sustainable Development Research, vol. 5, no. 3, 2021, em0168.
Additive manufacturing (AM), also known as 3D printing is a relatively new concept and promising technology for industrial production. It is important to investigate the environmental impact of the AM process in light of the environmental critical situation of the Earth. The elimination of some costly prefabrication processes such as molding or post-fabrication stages such as machining and welding required in traditional manufacturing methods favor the AM process and provide beneficial economic advantages. Furthermore, the reduction of manufacturing steps contributes to environmental protection through fewer operations, less material, and energy consumption, and reduced transportation. This study is a review for the assessment of environmental impact and life cycle of some well-known AM technologies for manufacturing metallic parts and components. The fabrication of a pump impeller is simulated through a well-known metal production AM technology and casting process for direct comparison. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is applied to measure the environmental impact in five different stages of pump impeller lifetime with the two different fabrication processes. AM compared to casting has an environmental impact reduction potential of 15%, 20%, 65%, 20%, and 10% respectively in Global Warming Potential (GWP), Acidifications Potential (AP), Water Aquatic Eco-toxicity Potential (FAETP), Human Toxicity Potential (HTP), and Stratospheric Ozone Depletion (ODP). Using hydroelectricity and renewable electricity mitigate the environmental impact of the AM process in pre-manufacturing and manufacturing stages temporarily until the advancement of AM technology for consuming less energy. Recommendations for future research to enhance the environmental sustainability of the AM process is proposed as outcomes of this study.
  • ASTM F2792: Standard Terminology for Additive Manufacturing Technologies (No. 12a), 2013.
  • Azarmi, F. and Sevostianov, I. (2020). Evaluation of the residual stresses in metallic materials produced by additive manufacturing technology: effect of microstructure. Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering, 28, 21-27.
  • Baumers, M., Dickens, P., Tuck, C. and Hague, R. (2016). The cost of additive manufacturing: machine productivity, economies of scale and technology-push. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 102, 193-201.
  • Bekker, A. C. M. and Verlinden, J. C. (2018). Life cycle assessment of wire + arc additive manufacturing compared to green sand casting and CNC milling in stainless steel. Journal of Cleaner Production, 177, 438-447.
  • Berman, B. (2012). 3-D printing: The new industrial revolution. Business Horizons, 55, 155-162.
  • Böckin, D. and Tillman, A. M. (2019). Environmental assessment of additive manufacturing in the automotive industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 226, 977-987.
  • Catlin, J. R. and Wang, Y. (2013). Recycling gone bad: When the option to recycle increases resource consumption. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23, 122-127.
  • Chan, J. K. H. (2016). The ethics of working with wicked urban waste problems: The case of Singapore’s Semakau Landfill. Landscape and Urban Planning, 154, 123-131.
  • Chen, D., Heyer, S., Ibbotson, S., Salonitis, K., Steingrímsson, J. G. and Thiede, S. (2015). Direct digital manufacturing: definition, evolution, and sustainability implications. Journal of Cleaner Production, 107, 615-625.
  • DebRoy, T., Wei, H. L., Zuback, J. S., Mukherjee, T., Elmer, J. W., et al. (2018). Additive manufacturing of metallic components – Process, structure and properties. Progress in Material Science, 92, 112-224.
  • Despeisse, M., Yang, M., Evans, S., Ford, S. and Minshall, T. (2017). Sustainable Value Roadmapping Framework for Additive Manufacturing. Procedia CIRP, 61, 594-599.
  • Ding, D., Pan, Z., Cuiuri, D. and Li, H. (2015). Wire-feed additive manufacturing of metal components: technologies, developments and future interests. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 81, 465-481.
  •, 1992. 1,4-Dichlorobenzene (para-Dichlorobenzene).
  • Faludi, J., Baumers, M., Maskery, I. and Hague, R. (2017). Environmental impacts of selective laser melting: Do printer, powder, or power dominate? Journal of Industrial Ecology, 21, S144-S156.
  • Faludi, J., Bayley, C., Bhogal, S. and Iribarne, M. (2015). Comparing environmental impacts of additive manufacturing vs traditional machining via life-cycle assessment. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 21(1), 14-33.
  • Ford, S. and Despeisse, M. (2016). Additive manufacturing and sustainability: an exploratory study of the advantages and challenges. Journal of Cleaner Production, 137, 1573-1587.
  • Frazier, W. E. (2014). Metal Additive Manufacturing: A Review. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, 23, 1917-1928.
  • Frischknecht, R., Jungbluth, N., Althaus, H.-J., Bauer, C., Doka, G., et al. (2007). Swiss centre for life cycle inventories a joint initiative of the ETH domain and Swiss Federal Offices implementation of life cycle impact assessment methods data v2.0.
  • Frischknecht, R., Jungbluth, N., Althaus, H.-J., Hischier, R., Doka, G., et al. (2007). Overview and methodology. Data v2.0. Ecoinvent report No. 1 (Technical Report) | ETDEWEB.
  • Fröhlich, P., Lorenz, T., Martin, G., Brett, B. and Bertau, M. (2017). Valuable metals-recovery processes, current trends, and recycling strategies. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 56(10), 2544-2580.
  • Fullenwider, B., Kiani, P., Schoenung, J. M. and Ma, K. (2019). Two-stage ball milling of recycled machining chips to create an alternative feedstock powder for metal additive manufacturing. Powder Technology, 342, 562-571.
  • Gebler, M., Schoot Uiterkamp, A. J. M. and Visser, C. (2014). A global sustainability perspective on 3D printing technologies. Energy Policy, 74, 158-167.
  • Graedel, T. E., Allwood, J., Birat, J.-P., Buchert, M., Hagelüken, C., et al. (2011). What do we know about metal recycling rates? Journal of Industrial Ecology, 15, 355-366.
  • Gu, D. D., Meiners, W., Wissenbach, K. and Poprawe, R. (2012). Laser additive manufacturing of metallic components: materials, processes and mechanisms. International Material Reviews, 57, 133-164.
  • Herzog, D., Seyda, V., Wycisk, E. and Emmelmann, C. (2016). Additive manufacturing of metals. Acta Materialia, 117, 371-392.
  • Huang, S. H., Liu, P., Mokasdar, A. and Hou, L. (2012). Additive manufacturing and its societal impact: A literature review. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 67, 1191-1203.
  • Johnson, J., Reck, B. K., Wang, T. and Graedel, T. E. (2008). The energy benefit of stainless steel recycling. Energy Policy 36, 181-192.
  • Jolliet, O., Margni, M., Charles, R., Humbert, S., Payet, J., et al. (2003). IMPACT 2002+: A new life cycle impact assessment methodology. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 8, 324-330.
  • Kellens, K., Baumers, M., Gutowski, T. G., Flanagan, W., Lifset, R. and Duflou, J. R. (2017). Environmental dimensions of additive manufacturing: Mapping application domains and their environmental implications. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 21(S1), S49-S68.
  • Kellens, K., Renaldi, R., Dewulf, W., Kruth, J. and Duflou, J. R. (2014). Environmental impact modeling of selective laser sintering processes. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 20, 459-470.
  • Kosai, S. and Yamasue, E. (2019). Global warming potential and total material requirement in metal production: Identification of changes in environmental impact through metal substitution. Science of the Total Environment, 651(Part 2), 1764-1775.
  • LCA data |
  • Le, V. T., Paris, H. and Mandil, G. (2017). Process planning for combined additive and subtractive manufacturing technologies in a remanufacturing context. J. Manuf. Syst. 44, 243-254.
  • Levy, G. N., Schindel, R. and Kruth, J. P. (2003). Rapid manufacturing and rapid tooling with layer manufacturing (LM) technologies, state of the art and future perspectives. CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology, 52(2), 589-609.
  • Leyens, C. and Beyer, E. (2014). Innovations in laser cladding and direct laser metal deposition. In Laser Surface Engineering: Processes and Applications, pp. 181-192.
  • Mami, F., Revéret, J. P., Fallaha, S. and Margni, M., 2017. Evaluating Eco-Efficiency of 3D Printing in the Aeronautic Industry. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 21(S1), S37-S48.
  • Morrow, W. R., Qi, H., Kim, I., Mazumder, J. and Skerlos, S. J. (2007). Environmental aspects of laser-based and conventional tool and die manufacturing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15, 932-943.
  • Oettmeier, K. and Hofmann, E. (2016). Impact of additive manufacturing technology adoption on supply chain management processes and components. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 27, 944-968.
  • Paris, H., Mokhtarian, H., Coatanéa, E., Museau, M. and Ituarte, I. F. (2016). Comparative environmental impacts of additive and subtractive manufacturing technologies. CIRP Annals, 65, 29-32.
  • Peng, S., Li, T., Wang, X., Dong, M., Liu, Z., Shi, J. and Zhang, H. (2017). Toward a sustainable impeller production: Environmental impact comparison of different impeller manufacturing methods. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 21, S216-S229.
  • Peng, T., Kellens, K., Tang, R., Chen, C. and Chen, G. (2018). Sustainability of additive manufacturing: An overview on its energy demand and environmental impact. Additive Manufacturing, 21, 694-704.
  • Pertsova, C. C. (2007). Ecological economics research trends. Nova Science Publishers.
  • Petrovic, V., Vicente Haro Gonzalez, J., Jordá Ferrando, O., Delgado Gordillo, J., Ramón Blasco Puchades, J. and Portolés Griñan, L. (2011). Additive layered manufacturing: sectors of industrial application shown through case studies. International Journal of Production Research, 49, 1061-1079.
  • Pinkerton, A. J. (2016). Lasers in additive manufacturing. Optics & Laser Technology, 78, 25-32.
  • Pinkerton, A. J. and Li, L. (2003). Rapid prototyping using direct laser deposition—the effect of powder atomization type and flowrate. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 217(6), 741-752.
  • Rebitzer, G., Ekvall, T., Frischknecht, R., Hunkeler, D., Norris, G., et al. (2004). Life cycle assessment: Part 1: Framework, goal and scope definition, inventory analysis, and applications. Environment International, 30(5), 701-720.
  • Renou, S., Thomas, J. S., Aoustin, E. and Pons, M. N. (2008). Influence of impact assessment methods in wastewater treatment LCA. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16, 1098-1105.
  • Rosenbaum, R. K., Bachmann, T. M., Gold, L. S., Huijbregts, M. A. J., Jolliet, O., et al. (2008). USEtox—the UNEP-SETAC toxicity model: recommended characterisation factors for human toxicity and freshwater ecotoxicity in life cycle impact assessment. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 13, 532-546.
  • Rowland, F. S. (2009). Stratospheric Ozone Depletion, in: Twenty Years of Ozone Decline. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp. 23-66.
  • Ryding, S.-O. (1999). ISO 14042 Environmental management, Life cycle assessment, Life cycle impact assessment. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 4, 307-307.
  • Salonitis, K., Jolly, M. R., Zeng, B. and Mehrabi, H. (2016). Improvements in energy consumption and environmental impact by novel single shot melting process for casting. Journal of Cleaner Production, 137, 1532-1542.
  • Seifi, M., Salem, A., Beuth, J., Harrysson, O. and Lewandowski, J. J. (2016). Overview of materials qualification needs for metal additive manufacturing. JOM, 68, 747-764.
  • Selcuk, C. (2011). Laser metal deposition for powder metallurgy parts. Powder Metallurgy, 54(2), 94-99.
  • Serres, N., Tidu, D., Sankare, S. and Hlawka, F. (2011). Environmental comparison of MESO-CLAD® process and conventional machining implementing life cycle assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19, 1117-1124.
  • Shamsaei, N., Yadollahi, A., Bian, L., Thompson, S.M., 2015. An overview of Direct Laser Deposition for additive manufacturing; Part II: Mechanical behavior, process parameter optimization and control. Additive Manufacturing, 8, 12-35.
  • Sreenivasan, R., Goel, A. and Bourell, D. L. (2010). Sustainability issues in laser-based additive manufacturing. Physics Procedia, 5(Part A), 81-90.
  • Srivatsan, T. S. and Sudarshan, T. S. (2015). Additive manufacturing innovations, Advances, and Applications, 1st ed. CRC Press.
  • Stock, T. and Seliger, G. (2016). Opportunities of sustainable manufacturing in Industry 4.0. Procedia CIRP, 40, 536-541.
  • Sun, Z., Xiao, Y., Agterhuis, H., Sietsma, J. and Yang, Y. (2016). Recycling of metals from urban mines – a strategic evaluation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 2977-2987.
  • Sverdrup, H. U., Ragnarsdottir, K. V. and Koca, D. (2017). An assessment of metal supply sustainability as an input to policy: security of supply extraction rates, stocks-in-use, recycling, and risk of scarcity. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 359-372.
  • Thompson, S. M., Bian, L., Shamsaei, N. and Yadollahi, A. (2015). An overview of direct laser deposition for additive manufacturing; Part I: Transport phenomena, modeling and diagnostics. Additive Manufacturing, 8, 36-62.
  • Tofail, S. A. M., Koumoulos, E. P., Bandyopadhyay, A., Bose, S., O’Donoghue, L. and Charitidis, C. (2018). Additive manufacturing: scientific and technological challenges, market uptake and opportunities. Materials Today, 21(1), 22-37.
  • Torres-Carrillo, S., Siller, H. R., Vila, C., López, C. and Rodríguez, C. A. (2020). Environmental analysis of selective laser melting in the manufacturing of aeronautical turbine blades. Journal of Cleaner Production, 246, 119068.
  • US EPA, Understanding Global Warming Potentials. Available at:
  • Villamil, C., Nylander, J., Hallstedt, S. I., Schulte, J. and Watz, M. (2018). Additive manufacturing from a strategic sustainability perspective. In International Design Conference Design 2018.
  • Walachowicz, F., Bernsdorf, I., Papenfuss, U., Zeller, C., Graichen, A., et al. (2017). Comparative energy, resource and recycling lifecycle analysis of the industrial repair process of gas turbine burners using conventional machining and additive manufacturing. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 21, 205-215.
  • Yadroitsev, I., Krakhmalev, P., Yadroitsava, I., Johansson, S. and Smurov, I. (2013). Energy input effect on morphology and microstructure of selective laser melting single track from metallic powder. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 213(4), 606-613.
  • Yakout, M., Elbestawi, M. A. and Veldhuis, S. C. (2018). A review of metal additive manufacturing technologies. Solid State Phenomena, 278, 1-14.
  • Yilmaz, O., Anctil, A. and Karanfil, T. (2015). LCA as a decision support tool for evaluation of best available techniques (BATs) for cleaner production of iron casting. Journal of Cleaner Production, 105, 337-347.
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.