Submit a Manuscript

European Journal of Sustainable Development Research

Stakeholder Engagement: A Conceptual Framework and Initial Validation to Foster Sustainability Development in a Maritime Cluster
Oluyomi Abayomi Osobajo 1 * , Yannis Koliousis 2, Heather McLaughlin 3
More Detail
1 Aberdeen Business School Robert Gordon University Garthdee Road Aberdeen AB10 7QE, UK
2 School of Strategy & Leadership Coventry Business School Coventry University William Morris Building Gosford Street COVENTRY CV1 5D, UK
3 Faculty of Business and Law De Montfort University The Gateway Leicester LE1 9BH, UK
* Corresponding Author
Full Text (PDF)
Research Article

European Journal of Sustainable Development Research, 2021 - Volume 5 Issue 1, Article No: em0149
https://doi.org/10.21601/ejosdr/9664

Published Online: 16 Jan 2021

Views: 97 | Downloads: 59

Open Access
How to cite this article
APA 6th edition
In-text citation: (Osobajo et al., 2021)
Reference: Osobajo, O. A., Koliousis, Y., & McLaughlin, H. (2021). Stakeholder Engagement: A Conceptual Framework and Initial Validation to Foster Sustainability Development in a Maritime Cluster. European Journal of Sustainable Development Research, 5(1), em0149. https://doi.org/10.21601/ejosdr/9664
Vancouver
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Osobajo OA, Koliousis Y, McLaughlin H. Stakeholder Engagement: A Conceptual Framework and Initial Validation to Foster Sustainability Development in a Maritime Cluster. EUR J SUSTAIN DEV RE. 2021;5(1):em0149. https://doi.org/10.21601/ejosdr/9664
AMA 10th edition
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Osobajo OA, Koliousis Y, McLaughlin H. Stakeholder Engagement: A Conceptual Framework and Initial Validation to Foster Sustainability Development in a Maritime Cluster. EUR J SUSTAIN DEV RE. 2021;5(1), em0149. https://doi.org/10.21601/ejosdr/9664
Chicago
In-text citation: (Osobajo et al., 2021)
Reference: Osobajo, Oluyomi Abayomi, Yannis Koliousis, and Heather McLaughlin. "Stakeholder Engagement: A Conceptual Framework and Initial Validation to Foster Sustainability Development in a Maritime Cluster". European Journal of Sustainable Development Research 2021 5 no. 1 (2021): em0149. https://doi.org/10.21601/ejosdr/9664
Harvard
In-text citation: (Osobajo et al., 2021)
Reference: Osobajo, O. A., Koliousis, Y., and McLaughlin, H. (2021). Stakeholder Engagement: A Conceptual Framework and Initial Validation to Foster Sustainability Development in a Maritime Cluster. European Journal of Sustainable Development Research, 5(1), em0149. https://doi.org/10.21601/ejosdr/9664
MLA
In-text citation: (Osobajo et al., 2021)
Reference: Osobajo, Oluyomi Abayomi et al. "Stakeholder Engagement: A Conceptual Framework and Initial Validation to Foster Sustainability Development in a Maritime Cluster". European Journal of Sustainable Development Research, vol. 5, no. 1, 2021, em0149. https://doi.org/10.21601/ejosdr/9664
ABSTRACT
Sustainability development, as a concept, is becoming an important topic for discussion within the maritime industry due to its environmental impact and intensification of the compliance framework. Achieving sustainable development will require involvement from the industry diverse stakeholders. Yet the ongoing discussions and research studies on promoting sustainability within the maritime industry gave no attention to engaging the various stakeholders existing and/or operating within the industrial or professional cluster, whose absence from the decision-making processes may fail to address sustainability issues within the industry. This study argues in support of actively engaging the maritime industry diverse stakeholders to foster the implementation of sustainable development. Based on desk research and validation from subject experts, we propose a conceptual engagement framework that may be adopted by shipping entities to correctly identify and engage the industry key stakeholders towards promoting sustainable development.
KEYWORDS
stakeholder stakeholder engagement sustainability development maritime clusters
REFERENCES
  • Allen, E., Kruger, C., Leung, F. Y. and Stephens, J. C. (2013). Diverse perceptions of stakeholder engagement within an environmental modeling research team. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 3(3), 343-356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-013-0136-x
  • Amaeshi, K. M. and Crane, A. (2006). Stakeholder engagement: a mechanism for sustainable aviation. Corporate social responsibility and environmental management, 13(5), 245-260. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.108
  • Andriof, J. and Waddock, S. (2002). Unfolding stakeholder engagement. In J. Andriof, S. Waddock, B. Husted and S. Rahman (eds), Unfolding Stakeholder Thinking: Theory, Responsibility and Engagement (pp. 19-42). Greenleag Publishing: Sheffield.
  • Arslan, V., Kurt, R. E., Turan, O. and De Wolff, L. (2016). Safety culture assessment and implementation framework to enhance maritime safety. Transportation research procedia, 14, 3895-3904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.477
  • Ayuso, S., Ángel Rodríguez, M., García-Castro, R. and Ángel Ariño, M. (2011). Does stakeholder engagement promote sustainable innovation orientation? Industrial Management and Data Systems, 111(9), 1399-1417. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635571111182764
  • Benito, G. R., Berger, E., De la Forest, M. and Shum, J. (2003). A cluster analysis of the maritime sector in Norway. International Journal of Transport Management, 1(4), 203-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijtm.2003.12.001
  • Bryman, A. and Bell, E. (2015). Business Research Methods (4th Ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Cennamo, C., Berrone, P. and Gomez-Mejia, L. (2009). Does stakeholder management have a dark side? Journal of Business Ethics, 89, 491–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-0012-x
  • Chen, S. L., Jeevan, J. and Cahoon, S. (2016). Malaysian container seaport-hinterland connectivity: Status, challenges and strategies. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 32(3), 127-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajsl.2016.09.001
  • Denktas-Sakar, G. and Karatas-Cetin, C. (2012). Port sustainability and stakeholder management in supply chains: A framework on resource dependence theory. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 28(3), 301-319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajsl.2013.01.002
  • Dinwoodie, J., Tuck, S., Knowles, H., Benhin, J. and Sansom, M. (2012). Sustainable development of maritime operations in ports. Business Strategy and the Environment, 21(2), 111-126. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.718
  • Doloreux, D. and Shearmur, R. (2009). Maritime clusters in diverse regional contexts: The case of Canada. Marine Policy, 33(3), 520-527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2008.12.001
  • Doloreux, D., and Melançon, Y. (2008). On the dynamics of innovation in Quebec’s coastal maritime industry. Technovation, 28(4), 231-243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2007.10.006
  • Edmonson, A. and McManus, S. (2007). Methodological fit in management field research. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1155-1179. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.26586086
  • Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building Theories from Case Study Research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308385
  • Engel, J.R. (1990). Introduction: The ethics of sustainable development. Ethics of environment and development: Global challenge, international response, 1-23.
  • Foley, K. (2005). Meta-management: a stakeholder/quality management approach to wholeof-enterprise management. SAI Global. Sydney.
  • Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach (1st Ed.). Pitman Publishing: Boston, MA, USA, 24-25.
  • Galletta, A. and Cross, W. (2013). Mastering the Semi-Structured Interview and Beyond: From Research Design to Analysis and Publication. NYU Press, 2013
  • Gao, S. S. and Zhang, J. J. (2006). Stakeholder engagement, social auditing and corporate sustainability. Business process management journal, 12(6), 722-740. https://doi.org/10.1108/14637150610710891
  • Gladwin, T. N., Kennelly, J. J. and Krause, T. S. (1995). Shifting paradigms for sustainable development: Implications for management theory and research. Academy of management Review, 20(4), 874-907. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9512280024
  • Gopnik, M., Fieseler, C., Cantral, L., McClellan, K., Pendleton, L. and Crowder, L. (2012). Coming to the table: Early stakeholder engagement in marine spatial planning. Marine Policy, 36(5), 1139-1149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2012.02.012
  • Greenwood, M. (2007). Stakeholder engagement: beyond the myth of corporate responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 74, 315–327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9509-y
  • Holmes, B. (2011). Citizens’ engagement in policymaking and the design of public services. Canberra: Parliamentary Library.
  • International Maritime Organisation (IMO) (2020). IMO and the Sustainable Development Goals. Online. Available at: http://www.imo.org/en/MediaCentre/HotTopics/Pages/SustainableDevelopmentGoals.aspx (Accessed: 11 September 2020).
  • International Standard Organisation (ISO) (2010). Guidance on social responsibility. International Standard ISO/DIS 26000. Geneva: International Organisation for Standardisation.
  • Johnson, H., Johansson, M., Andersson, K. and Sodahl, B. (2013). Will the ship energy efficiency management plan reduce CO2 emissions? A comparison with ISO 5001 and the IMS code. Maritime Policy and Management, 40(2), 177-190. 90. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2012.757373
  • Kacmaz, E., Kara, G. and Yıldız, M. (2016). Evaluation of marine pollution caused by tanker ships and preventing under focus of the international regulations. Proceedings book, 318.
  • Keen, M. and Mahanty, S. (2006). Learning in sustainable natural resource management: challenges and opportunities in the Pacific. Society and Natural Resources, 19(6), 497-513. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920600663896
  • Koliousis, I. G., Papadimitriou, S., Riza, E., Stavroulakis, P. J. and Tsioumas, V. (2018). Scarcity theory and maritime clusters: From paradox to modelling. Marine Policy, 93, 40-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2018.03.029
  • Kwak, S. J., Yoo, S. H. and Chang, J. I. (2005). The role of the maritime industry in the Korean national economy: an input–output analysis. Marine Policy, 29(4), 371-383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2004.06.004
  • Langen, P. D. (2002). Clustering and performance: the case of maritime clustering in The Netherlands. Maritime Policy & Management, 29(3), 209-221. https://doi.org/10.1080/0308883021013260
  • Lawrence, A. T. (2002). The drivers of stakeholder engagement: Reflections on the case of Royal Dutch/Shell. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 71-86.
  • Lee, C. and Lam, J. (2012). Managing reverse logistics to enhance sustainability of industrial marketing. Industrial Marketing Management, 589-598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2012.04.006
  • Maguire, B., Potts, J. and Fletcher, S. (2012). The role of stakeholders in the marine planning process— Stakeholder analysis within the Solent, United Kingdom. Marine Policy, 36, 246-257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2011.05.012
  • Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R. and Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of management review, 22(4), 853-886. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9711022105
  • Nordström, J., Goerlandt, F., Sarsama, J., Leppänen, P., Nissilä, M., Ruponen, P., Lübcke, T. and Sonninen, S. (2016). Vessel TRIAGE: A method for assessing and communicating the safety status of vessels in maritime distress situations. Safety science, 85, 117-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2016.01.003
  • Osobajo, O. A. and Moore, D. (2017). Who is Who? Identifying the Different Sub-groups of Secondary Stakeholders within a Community: A Case Study of the Niger Delta Region of Nigeria Communities. International Business Research, 10(9), 188-209. https://doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v10n9p188
  • Pagano, A., Wang, G., Sánchez, O., Ungo, R. and Tapiero, E. (2016). The impact of the Panama Canal expansion on Panama’s maritime cluster. Maritime Policy & Management, 43(2), 164-178. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2016.1140241
  • Pinto, H., Cruz, A. R. and Combe, C. (2015). Cooperation and the emergence of maritime clusters in the Atlantic: Analysis and implications of innovation and human capital for blue growth. Marine Policy, 57, 167-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2015.03.029
  • Potter, B. (2017). Environmental policy in California: setting the stage for marine invasive species management.
  • Project Management Institute Standards Committee. (2004). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (3rd Ed.). Pennsylvania, PA, USA, 2004; 81-86.
  • Reed, M. S. (2008). Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review. Biological conservation, 141(10), 2417-2431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.014
  • Rotheroe, N., Keenlyside, K. and Coates, L. (2003). Local agenda 21: articulating the meaning of sustainable development at the level of the individual enterprise. Journal of Cleaner Production, 11, 537-548. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-6526(02)00075-6
  • Savage, G. T., Nix, T. W., Whitehead, C. J. and Blair, J. D. (1991). Strategies for assessing and managing organisational stakeholders. Academy of Management Executive, 5(2), 61-75. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.1991.4274682
  • Sharma, S. and Henriques, I. (2005). Stakeholder influences on sustainability practices in the Canadian forest products industry. Strategic management journal, 26(2), 159-180. https://doi.org/625 10.1002/smj.439
  • Svensson, E. (2012). Sustainable shipping in the European Union. Available at: http://www.chalmers.se/gmv/EN/projects/epsd/downloadFile/attachedFile_f0/Sustainable_Shipping_in_the_European_Union?nocache=1361441035.61 (Accessed: 5 January 2019).
  • Talley, J. L., Schneider, J. and Lindquist, E. (2016). A simplified approach to stakeholder engagement in natural resource management: The Five-Feature Framework. Ecology and Society, 21(4). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08830-210438
  • Viederyte, R. (2013). Maritime cluster organizations: Enhancing role of maritime industry development. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 81, 624-631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.487
  • Weber, N. and Christophersen, T., 2002. The influence of non-governmental organisations on the creation of Natura 2000 during the European Policy process. Forest policy and economics, 4(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1389-9341(01)00070-3
LICENSE
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
All Rights Reserved © 2017-2021