EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH
Research Article

Economic and Environmental Analyses of Multi-Generation Renewable Energy System for Dairy Farms

European Journal of Sustainable Development Research, 2022, 6(1), em0174, https://doi.org/10.21601/ejosdr/11397
Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

In the present work, economic and environment analyses of multi-generational micro gas turbine systems are reported for a grid-independent dairy farm in Ontario, Canada. Onsite anaerobic digesters utilize farm waste to produce carbon neutral biogas for combustion in the micro gas turbine modules. A range of micro gas turbines coupled with absorption refrigeration units and an organic Rankine cycle are driven by the recovered waste heat to meet the cooling and electrical needs of farm sizes between 250 and 6000 cows. Farms of these sizes are observed to be capable of having their cooling and electricity needs met with micro gas turbines ranging in capacity from 100 to 1000 kW output. Environmental performance is maximized when the net output of the system just matches the energy requirement of the farm, and produces no excess electricity. Thus to minimize the environmental impact, but remain financially viable, various configurations are suggested for farm sizes under 2000 cows.

KEYWORDS

renewable energy dairy farm multi-generation economic analysis environmental analysis

CITATION (APA)

Cuomo, M. A., Kool, E. D., Reddy, B. V., & Rosen, M. A. (2022). Economic and Environmental Analyses of Multi-Generation Renewable Energy System for Dairy Farms. European Journal of Sustainable Development Research, 6(1), em0174. https://doi.org/10.21601/ejosdr/11397
Harvard
Cuomo, M. A., Kool, E. D., Reddy, B. V., and Rosen, M. A. (2022). Economic and Environmental Analyses of Multi-Generation Renewable Energy System for Dairy Farms. European Journal of Sustainable Development Research, 6(1), em0174. https://doi.org/10.21601/ejosdr/11397
Vancouver
Cuomo MA, Kool ED, Reddy BV, Rosen MA. Economic and Environmental Analyses of Multi-Generation Renewable Energy System for Dairy Farms. EUR J SUSTAIN DEV RES. 2022;6(1):em0174. https://doi.org/10.21601/ejosdr/11397
AMA
Cuomo MA, Kool ED, Reddy BV, Rosen MA. Economic and Environmental Analyses of Multi-Generation Renewable Energy System for Dairy Farms. EUR J SUSTAIN DEV RES. 2022;6(1), em0174. https://doi.org/10.21601/ejosdr/11397
Chicago
Cuomo, Matthew A., Eric D. Kool, Bale V. Reddy, and Marc A. Rosen. "Economic and Environmental Analyses of Multi-Generation Renewable Energy System for Dairy Farms". European Journal of Sustainable Development Research 2022 6 no. 1 (2022): em0174. https://doi.org/10.21601/ejosdr/11397
MLA
Cuomo, Matthew A. et al. "Economic and Environmental Analyses of Multi-Generation Renewable Energy System for Dairy Farms". European Journal of Sustainable Development Research, vol. 6, no. 1, 2022, em0174. https://doi.org/10.21601/ejosdr/11397

REFERENCES

  1. Capper, J. L. and Cady, R. A. (2020). The effects of improved performance in the U.S. dairy cattle industry on environmental impacts between 2207 and 2017. Journal of Animal Science, 98(1), skz291. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skz291
  2. Capstone Turbine Corporation, (2012). Capstone Turbine Corporation Solutions, Capstone Turbine Corporation. Available at: http://www.capstoneturbine.com/prodsol/solutions/chp.asp
  3. Clarke, S. and House, H. (2010). Using Less Energy on Dairy Farms. Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, Ontario.
  4. Collins, D. (2011). Competitive Advantages of being Eco-friendly. In Business Ethics: How to Design and Manage Ethical Organizations (pp. 345-346). New York: Wiley.
  5. Cuomo, M. A., Kool, E., Reddy, B. V. and Rosen, M. A. (2018a). Energy modelling and analysis of a multi-generation renewable energy system for dairy farm applications, Biofuels. https://doi.org/10.1080/17597269.2018.1469342
  6. Cuomo, M. A., Kool, E., Reddy, B. V. and Rosen, M. A. (2018b). Multi-generation renewable energy system for dairy farms: Exergy analysis, European Journal of Sustainable Development Research, 2(3), 37. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejosdr/2669
  7. Hettiarachchia, M. H. D., Mihajlo, G., William, M. W. and Yasuyuki, I. (2006). Optimum design criteria for an Organic Rankine cycle using low-temperature geothermal heat sources, Energy, 32(9), 1698-1706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2007.01.005
  8. Hydro One. (2012). Rates & Prices. Available at: http://www.hydroone.com/RegulatoryAffairs/RatesPrices/Pages/default.aspx
  9. Kissock, K., Carpenter, K. and D’Antonio, M. (2007). Common excess air rends in industrial boilerswith single- point positioning control and strategies to optimize efficiency. 2007 ACEEE Summer Study on Enery Efficiency in Industry.
  10. Loo, S. V. and Koppejan, J. (2010). The Handbook of Biomass Combustion & Co-firing. Washington: Earthscan.
  11. Nag, P. K. (2008). Power Plant Engineering. New Delhi: Tata McGraw-Hill.
  12. Natural Resources Canada. (2010). Country Biogas Report. Available at: http://www.iea-biogas.net/files/daten-redaktion/download/publications/country-reports/2010/Canada_Country_Report_11-2010.pdf
  13. Ontario Power Authority. (2012). FIT Program Pricing. Available at: http://fit.powerauthority.on.ca/fit-program-pricing
  14. Our Energy. (2012). Biofuels. Available at: http://www.our-energy.com/biofuels.html
  15. Segerkvist, K. V., Hansson, H., Sonesson, U. and Gunnarsson, S. (2020). Research on environmental, economic and social sustainability in dairy farms: A systematic mapping of current literature. Sustainability, 12(14), 5502. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145502
  16. Smith, I. K., Stosic, N., Kovacevic, A. and Langson, R. (2007). Cost Effective ORC Heat recovery Systems for Power Recovery from Low Enthalpy Geothermal Sources, Transactions, Geothermal Resource Council 31, January.
  17. Smith, R. (2005). Chemical Process Design and Integration. New York: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471238961.chemsmit.a01
  18. SolarNext AG. (2008). Chillii ACC50 - Absorption Chiller,”06. Available at: www.solarnext.de
  19. Sorguven, E. and Ozilgen, M. (2012). Energy utilization, carbon dioxide emission, and exergy loss in flavored yogurtproduction process. Energy, 40(1), 214-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2012.02.003
  20. Spachos, T. and Stamatis, A. (2011). Thermal analysis and optimization of an anaerobic treatment system of whey. Renewable Energy, 36(8), 2097-2105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2011.01.020
  21. Turbec. (2012). Turbec Products. Available at: http://www.turbec.com/products/products.htm
  22. Yildirim, N. and Genc, S. (2015). Thermodynamic analysis of a milk pasteurization process assisted by geothermal energy. Energy, 90(1), 987-996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.08.003
  23. Yildirim, N. and Genc, S. (2017). Energy and exergy analysis of a milk powder production system. Energy Conversion and Management, 149, 698-705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2017.01.064

LICENSE

Creative Commons License
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.