European Journal of Sustainable Development Research

• Akporube, K. A., Kalu, E., Ikpendu, C., & Edward, I. G. (2023). Poultry waste management in Nigeria: A neglected sector. Journal of Sustainable Veterinary and Allied Sciences, 4(2), 137-145. https://doi.org/10.54328/covm.josvas.2023.123
• Alharbi, M., Alseroury, F., & Alkthami, B. (2023). Biogas production from manure of camel and sheep using tomato and rumen as co-substrate. Journal of Ecological Engineering, 24(11), 54-61. https://doi.org/10.12911/22998993/170984
• APHA. (2000). American Public Health Association method 2540. http://edgeanalytical.com/wp-content/uploads/Waste_SM2540.pdf
• Baâti, S., Benyoucef, F., Makan, A., El Bouadili, A., & El Ghmari, A. (2018). Influence of hydraulic retention time on biogas production during leachate treatment. Environmental Engineering Research, 23(3), 288-293. https://doi.org/10.4491/eer.2017.200
• Domingues, R. R., Trugilho, P. F., Silva, C. A., De Melo, I. C. N. A., Melo, L. C. A., Magriotis, Z. M., & Sánchez-Monedero, M. A. (2017). Properties of biochar derived from wood and high-nutrient biomasses with the aim of agronomic and environmental benefits. PLoS ONE, 12(5), Article e0176884. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176884
• Fajobi, M. O., Lasode, O. A., Adeleke, A. A., Ikubanni, P. P., & Balogun, A. O. (2022). Investigation of physicochemical characteristics of selected lignocellulose biomass. Scientific Reports, 12, Article 2918. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-07061-2
• Fernández-Rodríguez, M. J., Mancilla-Leytón, J. M., de la Lama-Calvente, D., & Borja, R. (2023). Evaluation of batch mesophilic anaerobic digestion of raw and trampled llama and dromedary dungs: Methane potential and kinetic study. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, 13(18), 17165-17173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-021-02255-6
• Fernández-Rodríguez, M. J., Puntano, N. F., Mancilla-Leytón, J. M., & Borja, R. (2021). Batch mesophilic anaerobic co-digestion of spent goat batch mesophilic anaerobic co-digestion of spent goat straw bedding and goat cheese whey: Comparison with the mono-digestion of the two sole substrates. Journal of Environmental Management, 280, Article 111733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111733
• Ghani, Z. A., Azlan, M., Ishak, M., & Ismail, K. (2011). Direct liquefaction of Mukah Balingian low-rank Malaysian coal: Optimization using response surface methodology. Asia-Pacific Journal of Chemical Engineering, 6(4), 581-588. https://doi.org/10.1002/apj.442
• Haider, M. R., Zeshan, Yousaf, S., Malik, R. N., & Visvanathan, C. (2015). Effect of mixing ratio of food waste and rice husk co-digestion and substrate to inoculum ratio on biogas production. Bioresource Technology, 190, 451-457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.02.105
• Iweka, S. C., Abiodun, O., & Atilade, F. (2024). Biogas production from Udara seeds inoculated with food waste digestate and its optimal output for energy utilities: Central composite design and machine learning approach. Energy Science & Engineering.
• Kafle, G. K., & Chen, L. (2015). Comparison on batch anaerobic digestion of five different livestock manures and prediction of biochemical methane potential (BMP) using different statistical models. Waste Management, 48, 492-502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2015.10.021
• Kaur, H., & Kommalapati, R. R. (2021). Biochemical methane potential and kinetic parameters of goat manure at various inoculum to substrate ratios. Sustainability, 13(22), Article 12806. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212806
• Lima, M. J. R., Teixeira-Lemos, E., Oliveira, J., Teixeira-Lemos, L. P., Monteiro, A. M. C., & Costa, J. M. (2018). Nutritional and health profile of goat products: Focus on health benefits of goat milk. In S. Kukovics (Ed.), Goat science. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.70321
• Liu, X., Khalid, H., Amin, F. R., Ma, X., & Li, X. (2018). Effects of hydraulic retention time on anaerobic digestion performance of food waste to produce methane as a biofuel. Environmental Technology & Innovation, 11, 348-357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2018.06.004
• Lohani, S. P., Acharya, A., Koirala, R., Koirala, A., Lamsal, B., & Sanjay N. Khanal. (2020). Anaerobic co-digestion of food waste, goat and chicken manure for sustainable biogas production. International Journal of Energy Applications and Technologies, 7(4), 120-125. https://doi.org/10.31593/ijeat.748982
• Ma, X., Jiang, T., Chang, J., Tang, Q., Luo, T., & Cui, Z. (2019). Effect of substrate to inoculum ratio on biogas production and microbial community during hemi-solid-state batch anaerobic co-digestion of rape straw and dairy manure. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 189(3), 884-902. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-019-03035-9
• Mitiku, T., & Kifle, T. (2023). Production of biogas from co-digestion of goat manure and watermelon (citrullus lanatus) fruit peels under anaerobic condition. Journal of Universal Sciences and Technology, 2(1), 81-90.
• Mohamed, H. H., & Morsy, M. I. (2018). Study the effect of dry fermentation of goat manure in optimization of biogas production and minimization of costs. Misr Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 35(3), 1149-1164. https://doi.org/10.21608/mjae.2018.95606
• Mostafa Imeni, S., Pelaz, L., Corchado-Lopo, C., Maria Busquets, A., Ponsá, S., & Colón, J. (2019). Techno-economic assessment of anaerobic co-digestion of livestock manure and cheese whey (cow, goat & sheep) at small to medium dairy farms. Bioresource Technology, 291, Article 121872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.121872
• Muatip, K., Purwaningsih, H., Safitri, L., & Pamungkas, A. D. (2022). Social factors influencing the goat farmers knowledge of waste processing in Banyumas Regency, Central Java, Indonesia. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Tropical Agrifood, Feed and Fuel (pp. 93-97). https://doi.org/10.2991/absr.k.220102.015
• Nayik, G. A., Jagdale, Y. D., Gaikwad, S. A., Devkatte, A. N., Dar, A. H., Dezmirean, D. S., Bobis, O., Ranjha, M. M. A. N., Ansari, M. J., Hemeg, H. A., & Alotaibi, S. S. (2021). Recent insights into processing approaches and potential health benefits of goat milk and its products: A review. Frontiers in Nutrition, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2021.789117
• Ngulde, Y., & Mustapha, A. (2018). Evaluation of cow dung and goat pellets for production of biogas in University of Maiduguri, North-Eastern Nigeria. African Journal of Environment and Natural Science Research, 1(1), 33-43.
• Nwaezeapu, A. O., & Agbozu, I. E. (2023). Proximate and compositional assessment of pretreatment methods on selected lignocellulose biomass for biogas production. International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences, 17(5), 2115-2127. https://doi.org/10.4314/ijbcs.v17i5.28
• Obileke, K. C., Nwokolo, N., Makaka, G., Mukumba, P., & Onyeaka, H. (2021). Anaerobic digestion: Technology for biogas production as a source of renewable energy–A review. Energy and Environment, 32(2), 191-225. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305X20923117
• Odejobi, O. J., Oladunni, A. A., & Jegede, A. O. (2017). Environmental effects anaerobic treatment of wastewater using an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 38(20), 3011-3018. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2015.1129372
• Ogundola, A. C., Orhadahwe, T. A., Ojetoye, A. O., Emmanuel, C. O., & Ogundola, O. C. (2023). Development of a computational model for the estimation of biogas production from putrescible wastes. Engineering and Applied Science Research, 51(1), 98-105. https://doi.org/10.14456/easr.2024.11
• Oladunni, A. A., Babatunde, O., Oladeji, O. S., Oyetola, E. O., Daniel, D. U., Oyetola, E. O., Udeme, D., Optimization, D., Oladunni, A. A., Babatunde, O., Oladeji, O. S., Oyetola, E. O., & Daniel, D. U. (2023). Optimization of terminalia neotaliala (Madagascar almond) seed oil yield using central composite design and its fatty acid profiling using central composite design and its fatty acid profiling. Biofuels, 15(4), 407-414. https://doi.org/10.1080/17597269.2023.2250975
• Oladunni, A. A., Odejobi, O. J., Sanda, O., & Sonibare, J. A. (2021). Optimization of combined mixture and process variables for the pyrolysis oil yield from co-pyrolysis of polymeric wastes. Environmental Quality Management, 30(4), 83-99. https://doi.org/10.1002/tqem.21739
• Opurum, C. C., Nweke, C. O., Nwanyanwu, C. E., & Nwachukwu, I. N. (2019). Kinetic study of anaerobic digestion of goat manure with poultry dropping and plantain peels for biogas production. International Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 8, 22-28.
• Orangun, A., Kaur, H., & Kommalapati, R. R. (2021). Batch anaerobic co-digestion and biochemical methane potential analysis of goat manure and food waste. Energies, 14(7), Article 1952. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14071952
• Paolini, V., Petracchini, F., Segreto, M., Tomassetti, L., Naja, N., Cecinato, A., Paolini, V., Petracchini, F., Segreto, M., & Tomassetti, L. (2018). Toxic/hazardous substances and environmental engineering environmental impact of biogas: A short review of current knowledge. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A, 53(10), 899-906. https://doi.org/10.1080/10934529.2018.1459076
• Parajuli, A., Khadka, A., Sapkota, L., & Ghimire, A. (2022). Effect of hydraulic retention time and organic-loading rate on two-staged, semi-continuous mesophilic anaerobic digestion of food waste during start-up. Fermentation, 8(11), Article 620. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation8110620
• Ruihong, Z., Hamed, E., Karl, H., Fengyu, W., Josh, R., Chris, C., & Paul, G. (2005). Characterization of food and greenwastes as feedstock for anaerobic digesters. California Energy Commission. http://biorealis.com/OMV/files/FoodandGreenWasteCharacterizationReportforCEC.pdf
• Safian, M. T. U., Ghani, Z. A., Ismail, K., & Ishak, M. A. M. (2011). Coal liquefaction using semi-continuous solvent flow two-stage reactor system: Optimizing using response surface methodology (RSM). In Proceedings of the 3^rd ISESEE 2011–International Symposium and Exhibition in Sustainable Energy and Environment (pp. 55-62). https://doi.org/10.1109/ISESEE.2011.5977110
• Sakthivel, R., Ramesh, K., Purnachandran, R., & Mohamed Shameer, P. (2018). A review on the properties, performance and emission aspects of the third generation biodiesels. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 82(Part 3), 2970-2992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.10.037
• Samer, M., Hijazi, O., Abdelsalam, E., & Bernhardt, H. (2022). Life cycle assessment of a portable assembly biogas unit used for treating biowastes. Agricultural Engineering International: CIGR Journal, 24(1), 145-158.
• Shen, X., Huang, G., Yang, Z., & Han, L. (2015). Compositional characteristics and energy potential of Chinese animal manure by type and as a whole. Applied Energy, 160, 108-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.09.034
• Utaaker, K. S., Chaudhary, S., Kifleyohannes, T., & Robertson, L. J. (2021). Global goat! Is the expanding goat population an important reservoir of cryptosporidium? Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.648500
• Zhang, T., Liu, L., Song, Z., Ren, G., Feng, Y., Han, X., & Yang, G. (2013). Biogas production by co-digestion of goat manure with three crop residues. PLoS ONE, 8(6), Article e66845. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066845
• Zhang, Y., Kusch-Brandt, S., Salter, A. M., & Heaven, S. (2021). Estimating the methane potential of energy crops: An overview on types of data sources and their limitations. Processes, 9(9), Article 1565. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9091565

APA

Oladunni, A. A., Oladeji, O. D., & Orhadahwe, T. A. (2025). Effect of hydraulic retention time and substrate-to-inoculum ratio on batch anaerobic digestion of goat manure and response surface methodology optimization. European Journal of Sustainable Development Research, 9(3), em0295. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejosdr/16337

Vancouver

Oladunni AA, Oladeji OD, Orhadahwe TA. Effect of hydraulic retention time and substrate-to-inoculum ratio on batch anaerobic digestion of goat manure and response surface methodology optimization. EUR J SUSTAIN DEV RES. 2025;9(3):em0295. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejosdr/16337

AMA

Oladunni AA, Oladeji OD, Orhadahwe TA. Effect of hydraulic retention time and substrate-to-inoculum ratio on batch anaerobic digestion of goat manure and response surface methodology optimization. EUR J SUSTAIN DEV RES. 2025;9(3), em0295. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejosdr/16337

Chicago

Oladunni, Atilade Amos, Olawale David Oladeji, and Thomas Aghogho Orhadahwe. "Effect of hydraulic retention time and substrate-to-inoculum ratio on batch anaerobic digestion of goat manure and response surface methodology optimization". European Journal of Sustainable Development Research 2025 9 no. 3 (2025): em0295. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejosdr/16337

Harvard

Oladunni, A. A., Oladeji, O. D., and Orhadahwe, T. A. (2025). Effect of hydraulic retention time and substrate-to-inoculum ratio on batch anaerobic digestion of goat manure and response surface methodology optimization. European Journal of Sustainable Development Research, 9(3), em0295. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejosdr/16337

MLA

Oladunni, Atilade Amos et al. "Effect of hydraulic retention time and substrate-to-inoculum ratio on batch anaerobic digestion of goat manure and response surface methodology optimization". European Journal of Sustainable Development Research, vol. 9, no. 3, 2025, em0295. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejosdr/16337