European Journal of Sustainable Development Research

Exergy Analysis as a Tool for Addressing Climate Change
Marc A. Rosen 1 *
More Detail
1 Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, Oshawa, Ontario, L1G 0C5, CANADA
* Corresponding Author
Research Article

European Journal of Sustainable Development Research, 2021 - Volume 5 Issue 2, Article No: em0148

Published Online: 16 Jan 2021

Views: 791 | Downloads: 798

How to cite this article
APA 6th edition
In-text citation: (Rosen, 2021)
Reference: Rosen, M. A. (2021). Exergy Analysis as a Tool for Addressing Climate Change. European Journal of Sustainable Development Research, 5(2), em0148.
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Rosen MA. Exergy Analysis as a Tool for Addressing Climate Change. EUR J SUSTAIN DEV RES. 2021;5(2):em0148.
AMA 10th edition
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Rosen MA. Exergy Analysis as a Tool for Addressing Climate Change. EUR J SUSTAIN DEV RES. 2021;5(2), em0148.
In-text citation: (Rosen, 2021)
Reference: Rosen, Marc A.. "Exergy Analysis as a Tool for Addressing Climate Change". European Journal of Sustainable Development Research 2021 5 no. 2 (2021): em0148.
In-text citation: (Rosen, 2021)
Reference: Rosen, M. A. (2021). Exergy Analysis as a Tool for Addressing Climate Change. European Journal of Sustainable Development Research, 5(2), em0148.
In-text citation: (Rosen, 2021)
Reference: Rosen, Marc A. "Exergy Analysis as a Tool for Addressing Climate Change". European Journal of Sustainable Development Research, vol. 5, no. 2, 2021, em0148.
Exergy is described as a tool for addressing climate change, in particular through identifying and explaining the benefits of sustainable energy, so the benefits can be appreciated by experts and non-experts alike and attained. Exergy can be used to understand climate change measures and to assess and improve energy systems. Exergy also can help better understand the benefits of utilizing sustainable energy by providing more useful and meaningful information than energy provides. Exergy clearly identifies efficiency improvements and reductions in wastes and environmental impacts attributable to sustainable energy. Exergy can also identify better than energy the environmental benefits and economics of energy technologies. Exergy should be applied by engineers and scientists, as well as decision and policy makers, involved in addressing climate change.
  • Aghbashlo, M. and Rosen, M. A. (2018). Exergoeconoenvironmental Analysis as a New Concept for Developing Thermodynamically, Economically, and Environmentally Sound Energy Conversion Systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 187, 190-204.
  • Aghbashlo, M. and Rosen, M. A. (2019). Towards a better understanding of energy systems using emergy-based exergoeconoenvironmental analysis. International Journal of Exergy, 28(3), 209-228.
  • Arango-Miranda, R., Hausler, R., Romero-Lopez, R., Glaus, M. and Ibarra-Zavaleta, S. P. (2018). Carbon dioxide emissions, energy consumption and economic growth: A comparative empirical study of selected developed and developing countries. “The role of exergy”. Energies, 11, 2668.
  • Ayres, R. U., Ayres, L. W. and Martinas, K. (1998). Exergy, waste accounting, and life-cycle analysis. Energy, 23, 355-363.
  • Aziz, M. (Ed.) (2019). Exergy and Its Application: Toward Green Energy Production and Sustainable Environment. IntechOpen: London.
  • Berthiaume, R. and Rosen, M. A. (2017). Limits imposed by the second law of thermodynamics on reducing greenhouse gas emissions to the atmosphere. Research Journal of Environmental Sciences, 11(1), 18-28.
  • Connelly, L. and Koshland, C. P. (1997). Two aspects of consumption: using an exergy-based measure of degradation to advance the theory and implementation of industrial ecology. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 19, 199-217.
  • Cornelissen, R. L. (1997). Thermodynamics and Sustainable Development (Ph.D. Thesis), University of Twente, the Netherlands.
  • Crane, P., Scott, D. S. and Rosen, M. A. (1992). Comparison of exergy of emissions from two energy conversion technologies, considering potential for environmental impact. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 17, 345-350.
  • Creyts, J. C. and Carey, V. P. (1997). Use of extended exergy analysis as a tool for assessment of the environmental impact of industrial processes. Proc. ASME Advanced Energy Systems Division, AES-Vol 37, 129-137.
  • Dincer, I. and Rosen, M. A. (2013). Exergy: Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
  • Edgerton, R. H. (1992). Available Energy and Environmental Economics. Toronto: D.C. Heath.
  • El-Sayed, Y. M. and Gaggioli, R. A. (1989). A critical review of second law costing methods: Parts I and II. ASME J. Energy Resources Technology, 111, 1-15.
  • Goldemberg, J., Johansson, T. B., Reddy, A. K. N. and Williams, R. H. (1988). Energy for a Sustainable World. New York: Wiley.
  • Hacatoglu, K., Dincer, I. and Rosen, M. A. (2015). A new model to assess the environmental impact and sustainability of energy systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 103, 211-218.
  • Hafele, W. (1981). Energy in a Finite World: A Global Systems Analysis. Toronto: Ballinger.
  • He, W., Kong, X., Qin, N., He, Q., Liu, W.X., Bai, Z., Wang, Y. and Xu, F. (2019). Combining species sensitivity distribution (SSD) model and thermodynamic index (exergy) for system-level ecological risk assessment of contaminates in aquatic ecosystems. Environment International, 133(Part B), 105275.
  • Hernandez, A. G. and Cullen, J. M. (2019). Exergy: A universal metric for measuring resource efficiency to address industrial decarbonisation. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 20, 151-164.
  • Jaber, M. Y., Nuwayhid, R. Y. and Rosen, M. A. (2004). Price-driven economic order systems from a thermodynamic point of view. Int. J. Production Research, 42, 5167-5184.
  • Kestin, J. (1980). Availability: the concept and associated terminology. Energy, 5, 679-692.
  • Khajehpour, H., Saboohi, Y. and Tsatsaronis, G. (2019). Exergy-based responsibility allocation of climate change. In: Leal Filho, W., Leal-Arcas, R. (Eds), University Initiatives in Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
  • Kılkış, B. and Kılkış, Ş. (2017). New exergy metrics for energy, environment, and economy nexus and optimum design model for nearly-zero exergy airport (nZEXAP) systems. Energy, 140(Part 2), 1329-1349.
  • Kotas, T. J. (1995). The Exergy Method of Thermal Plant Analysis (Reprint Ed.), Krieger, Malabar, Florida.
  • Lucia, U. and Grisolia, G. (2019). Exergy inefficiency: An indicator for sustainable development analysis. Energy Reports, 5, 62-69.
  • Mahmoudi, S. M. S., Sarabchi, N., Yari, M. and Rosen, M. A. (2019). Exergy and Exergoeconomic Analyses of a Combined Power Producing System Including a Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell and an Organic Rankine Cycle. Sustainability, 11(12), 3264.
  • Mazur, V. A. (2005). Fuzzy thermoeconomic optimization. Int. J. Exergy, 2, 1-13.
  • Moran, M. J. (1989). Availability Analysis: A Guide to Efficient Energy Use (Revised Ed.), ASME, New York.
  • Moran, M. J. and Sciubba, E. (1994). Exergy analysis: principles and practice, J. Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 116, 285-290.
  • Nielsen, S. N. (2019). Reductions in ecology and thermodynamics. On the problems arising when shifting the concept of exergy to other hierarchical levels and domains. Ecological Indicators, 100, 118-134.
  • Nielsen, S. N. (2020). Sustainable Development Indicators: An Exergy-Based Approach. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
  • Nižetić, S. and Papadopoulos, A. (Eds.). (2018). The Role of Exergy in Energy and the Environment. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
  • Nwodo, M. N. and Anumba, C. J. (2020). Exergetic life cycle assessment: A review. Energies, 13, 2684.
  • Reistad, G. M. (1970). Availability: Concepts and Applications (Ph.D. dissertation), Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison.
  • Rosen, M. A. (2011). Economics and Exergy: An Enhanced Approach to Energy Economics. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
  • Rosen, M. A. (2012). Environment, Ecology and Exergy: Enhanced Approaches to Environmental and Ecological Management. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
  • Rosen, M. A. (2013). Using exergy to assess regional and national energy utilization: A comparative review. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 38(2), 251-261.
  • Rosen, M. A. (2017a). Sustainable development: A vital quest. European Journal of Sustainable Development Research, 1(1), 2.
  • Rosen, M. A. (2017b). How Can We Achieve the UN Sustainable Development Goals? European Journal of Sustainable Development Research, 1(2), 06.
  • Rosen, M. A. (2017c). Bioenergy and energy sustainability. J. Fundamentals of Renewable Energy and Applications, 7(7), 25.
  • Rosen, M. A. and Dincer, I. (1997). On exergy and environmental impact. Int. J. Energy Res., 21, 643-654.<643::AID-ER284>3.0.CO;2-I
  • Rosen, M. A. and Dincer, I. (1999). Exergy analysis of waste emissions. Int. J Energy Res., 23, 1153-1163.<1153::AID-ER545>3.0.CO;2-Y
  • Rosen, M. A. and Dincer, I. (2003). Thermoeconomic analysis of power plants: an application to a coal-fired electrical generating station. Energy Conversion and Management, 44, 2743-2761.
  • Rosen, M. A. and Koohi-Fayegh, S. (2017). Geothermal Energy: Sustainable Heating and Cooling Using the Ground. London: Wiley.
  • Sciubba, E. (1999). Exergy as a direct measure of environmental impact. Proc. ASME Advanced Energy Systems Division, AES-Vol. 39, 573-581.
  • Sciubba, E. (2005). Exergo-economics: Thermodynamic foundation for a more rational resource use. International Journal of Energy Research, 29, 613-636.
  • Sciubba, E. (2019). Exergy-based ecological indicators: From Thermo-Economics to cumulative exergy consumption to Thermo-Ecological Cost and Extended Exergy Accounting. Energy, 168, 462-476.
  • Stanek, W. and Czarnowska, L. (2018). Thermo-ecological cost: Szargut’s proposal on exergy and ecology connection. Energy, 165(Part B), 1050-1059.
  • Stanek, W., Gladysz, P., Czarnowska, L. and Simla, T. (2019). Thermo-ecology: Exergy as a Measure of Sustainability. Elsevier, Oxford, UK.
  • Strong, M. F. (1992). Energy, environment and development, Energy Policy, 20, 490-494.
  • Szargut, J. (1980). International progress in second law analysis, Energy, 5, 709-718.
  • Szargut, J., Morris, D. R. and Steward, F. R. (1988). Exergy Analysis of Thermal, Chemical and Metallurgical Processes. New York: Hemisphere.
  • Tribus, M. and McIrivne, E. C. (1971). Energy and information. Sci. Am., 225(3), 179-188.
  • Tsatsaronis, G. (1987). A review of exergoeconomic methodologies. In Moran, M.J., Sciubba, E. (Eds.), Second Law Analysis of Thermal Systems (pp. 81-87), ASME, New York.
  • Tsatsaronis, G. (Ed.) (1994). Invited papers on exergoeconomics. Energy-The Int. Journal, 19, 279-381.
  • Tyagi, S. K., Chen, J. and Kaushik, S. C. (2005). Optimal criteria based on the ecological function of an irreversible intercooled regenerative modified Brayton cycle. Int. J. Exergy, 2, 90-107.
  • UN (2015). Transforming our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Report A/RES/70/1, United Nations, 2015. Available at:
  • Valero, A., Usón, S., Torres, C. and Stanek, W. (2017). Theory of exergy cost and thermo-ecological cost. In: Stanek W. (Ed.), Thermodynamics for Sustainable Management of Natural Resources (pp. 167-202, Chapter 7). Springer, Cham.
  • Valero, A., Valero, A. and Stanek, W. (2018). Assessing the exergy degradation of the natural capital: From Szargut’s updated reference environment to the new thermoecological-cost methodology. Energy, 163, 1140-1149.
  • Veiga, J. P. S. and Romanelli, T. L. (2020). Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions using exergy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 260, 121092.
  • Vihervaara, P., Franzese, P. P. and Buonocore, E. (2019). Information, energy, and eco-exergy as indicators of ecosystem complexity. Ecological Modelling 395:23-27.
  • Wall, G. (1993). Exergy, ecology and democracy-concepts of a vital society. Proc. International Conference on Energy Systems and Ecology (pp. 111-121), Cracow, Poland.
  • Whiting, K., Carmona, L. G. and Sousa, T. (2017). A review of the use of exergy to evaluate the sustainability of fossil fuels and non-fuel mineral depletion. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 76, 202-211.
  • Wu, J. and Wang, N. (2020). Exploring avoidable carbon emissions by reducing exergy destruction based on advanced exergy analysis: A case study. Energy, 206, 118246.
  • Zhang, M. and Reistad, G. M. (1998). Analysis of energy conversion systems, including material and global warming aspects. Int. J. Heating, Ventilating, Air-Cond. and Refrigerating Research, 1, 45-65.
  • Zhang, Y., Zhao, W., Li, B. and Li, H. (2018). Understanding the sustainability of fuel from the viewpoint of exergy. European Journal of Sustainable Development Research, 2(1), 09.
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.